Until Monday 3 August logon to our AMEE and MedEdWorld websites will be unavailable. MedEdPublish is providing a limited service.

Special Interest Groups (SIGs)

Welcome to the MedEdWorld Special Interest Groups (SIGs). This section of MedEdWorld  provides a facility for individuals with an interest in a specific aspect of education in the health care professions to engage in discussion and share information and ideas with others with a similar interest. Some groups have open access and others are by invitation only. AMEE members can initiate new SIGs by contacting [email protected] with details of the SIG such as title, description, educational area and the type of access to be permitted (open access or invitation only).

To contribute to a group discussion register as a user on MedEdWorld for FREE or join AMEE as a member.

SIG posts are regularly monitored.  Any posts that are considered to be libellous, slanderous or offensive will be removed.  MedEdWorld asks users to report inappropriate comments either by clicking on the ‘report abuse’ button at the bottom of each SIG post or the ‘Contact/Report abuse’ button in the left menu.

Social and Behavioural Sciences in Medical Education This SIG is for anyone interested in Behavioural and Social Science teaching in medicine.
SIGs > Social and Behavioural Sciences in Medical Education > Virgin and extra virgin View modes: 
User avatar
Simon Forrest - 13/03/2016 18:36:50
Virgin and extra virgin
A small child is sat at the kitchen table waiting for tea. Her mother is busy across the room washing some food in the sink. The girl pipes up, ‘Mummy can I ask you something?’ The woman says, ‘ Of course dear’. The girls asks, ‘What’s virgin mummy?’ The woman takes a deep breath and starts to explain that a virgin is what people are before they’ve had children and that everyone starts a virgin and it’s a special thing that you stop being when you make love for the first time. She pauses, asking the girl if she understand so far. She replies, Yes mummy’, and picking up the olive oil bottle on the table asks, ‘but what’s extra virgin then?’

Putting aside the way that this story purports to illustrate a peculiarly British attitude towards sex it made me think about the notion of the ‘teachable moment’, affirming its potential importance but also making me reflect on whether we can always recognise it as behavioural and social scientists working in medical education and, indeed, can we always access it?

There are certainly times when we are asked questions – the ‘what’s a virgin?’ moments.
There are also the ones where we might be the proactive player.

I was thinking of the time when I observed students practising chaperoning as they learnt the clinical skills of breast examination. I asked why we assumed that the key dynamic and concern here was about completely and only fixed within a heteronormative framing. What about if a woman presented for examination and identified as lesbian? What would chaperoning mean in that context and who should do it?

In truth I don’t recall the conversation going anywhere beyond a lively discussion about the issue but nonetheless this was teachability in the moment.

But we’re not always there to see the moment and in contexts such as lectures, and indeed even in small group or tutorial work, is there really the opportunity for students to all be in the moment or for the one or two who are to take our time and attention?
And, what about the fact that we often front-load BSS in medical curricula? One oft heard, but nonetheless perfectly plausible observation is that BSS become more intelligible, relevant, meaningful and useful to students as they increase their clinical contact with patients and communities and indeed other clinicians. It is here that the complex nature of health systems become real, the concept of the sick role becomes apparent, the ways that’s deeper concept such as power, identity, diversity, professionalism and professionalization play into situations and encounters may be salient and intelligible.

But are we present there? And if not, why not?

Would it possible to imagine a world in which the social scientists stands alongside the beside with the clinician and student? Is the optional and probably occasional elective in Year 4 with a social science dimensions enough – isn’t it just reaching the already engaged and hence the teachable but not those that might derive as much if not more benefit from being taught?

And what about solutions? Is it working to have more BBS orientation or components in Year 4 electives? There are examples, a long-term clerkship in social care environments for fourth years at Newcastle in NSW, Australia; a similar provision called the Difficult and Deprived Areas Project combining learning in GP and non-clinical contexts in areas of high socio-economic deprivation at Durham in the UK.

Is this enough though? Do we want to and how do we get into the place where the teachable moment is reachable?

User avatar
Tracey Collett - 11/05/2016 19:00:11
RE:Virgin and extra virgin
Sitting in a standard setting exam earlier today for year 1 students, I was on the one hand pleased at managing to work the sick role, ethnocentricty and the biomedical model into the syllabus and on the other hand saddened by the realisation that for many, these ideas will always remain dormant and have no meaning beyond their existence as text book concepts to be learned by rote. I think that now we have the core curriculum we need to move to demonstrating proof of effective teaching. Who is up for it?

User avatar
Kenneth T. Fritts Fritts - 29/06/2020 21:51:43
RE:Virgin and extra virgin